An In-Depth Analysis of the Best Generative AI Models & LLMs

Introduction: Navigating the AI Explosion of 2024-2025

The period spanning 2024 and 2025 will be remembered as a "Cambrian Explosion" for artificial intelligence. The pace of innovation has been staggering, with new models and capabilities emerging not annually, but monthly.¹ This rapid evolution has moved the industry far beyond simple text-based chatbots into a new era of multimodal, reasoning-focused, and highly specialized digital intelligence.

At their core, generative AI models are sophisticated systems designed to create novel content—including text, images, audio, and software code—by learning the underlying patterns and structures within vast datasets.² The dominant architecture behind this revolution is the

large language models (LLMs), particularly those built on the Transformer framework, which excels at processing context and relationships in data.²

The sheer volume of releases from labs like OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, and Meta can be overwhelming. To cut through the noise, our team of analysts has rigorously tested the most significant generative AI models and AI LLMs launched in 2024 and 2025. In this report, we share our hands-on experience, providing an expert guide to the best AI models available. We will detail which models excel at which tasks, identify their unique features, and offer clear recommendations for developers, researchers, and business leaders looking to harness their power.

Part 1: Understanding the Key Types of AI Models

Choosing the right model is no longer about picking the one with the highest benchmark score. It requires understanding the fundamental shifts in AI architecture and philosophy that have defined the last two years. The market has fractured along three key axes: modality, accessibility, and specialization. Understanding these types of AI models is the first step toward making an informed decision.

The Multimodal Shift: How AI LLMs Learned to See, Hear, and Speak

The era of text-only AI is officially over. Early attempts at multimodal AI involved clumsy pipelines, where separate models for speech-to-text, vision, and language processing were chained together. This process was slow and lost critical information, such as a speaker's tone of voice or emotional state.⁵

The breakthrough of 2024 was the arrival of natively multimodal models. Flagships like OpenAI's GPT-4o, Google's Gemini family, and Meta's Llama 4 are built on a single, unified neural network that can process text, audio, and vision inputs and outputs simultaneously.⁷ This native integration is not just an incremental feature; it is a paradigm shift. It enables fluid, real-time conversations with latency as low as 320 milliseconds—close to human response time.⁵ It also unlocks entirely new use cases, such as an AI that can watch a live video feed from a phone's camera and hold a spoken conversation about what it sees, or a tutoring agent that can look at a student's math homework on a screen and provide verbal guidance.⁵

The Great Divide: Open-Source vs. Proprietary Models

The AI landscape is sharply divided into two camps: proprietary and open-source. Proprietary models, developed by companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic, are "black boxes" accessed via an API. They offer cutting-edge performance and ease of use but come with recurring usage costs and a degree of vendor lock-in.¹²

In contrast, open-weight models from providers like Meta, Mistral AI, and DeepSeek make their model weights publicly available. This allows organizations to download, customize, and run the models on their own infrastructure (self-hosting), offering complete control, transparency, and potentially lower long-term costs, though it requires significant technical expertise.⁴

Until recently, the choice was a simple trade-off: top-tier performance from a proprietary model or lower cost and control from a less capable open-source one. That is no longer the case. The performance of open-weight models has matured so rapidly that this distinction is now obsolete. The release of Meta's Llama 3.1, with its massive 405B parameters, and Llama 4 Maverick demonstrated that open models could achieve benchmark scores competitive with, and in some cases exceeding, their proprietary rivals.⁴ Concurrently, companies like Mistral AI began releasing highly specialized open-weight models, such as Magistral, that are purpose-built for advanced reasoning—a domain previously dominated by closed-source leaders.¹⁶ This forces a fundamental re-evaluation of strategy. The decision is no longer just about cost versus performance. It is a strategic choice between the absolute frontier capabilities of a proprietary model like GPT-5 and the power to deeply customize an open model like Llama 4 on private data for a specific vertical, which could yield superior results for that niche application.¹³

The Rise of the Reasoning Engines: Differentiating Generalists and Specialists

For years, the primary goal of LLMs AI development was fluency—making models sound more human-like. The industry is now hitting a point of diminishing returns on eloquence alone. The new frontier is reasoning: improving a model's ability to perform complex, multi-step logical deduction.¹⁸

This has given rise to a new class of specialist "reasoning engines." Models like OpenAI's "o" series (o1, o3) and Mistral's Magistral are architecturally different from their general-purpose cousins.⁷ They are designed to use more computational resources and "thinking time" to methodically work through a problem, much like a human expert would.⁷ The results are striking. In September 2024, OpenAI's o1 model demonstrated PhD-level performance in physics and chemistry and solved 83% of International Mathematics Olympiad qualifying problems—tasks that stump even the most advanced generalist models.⁷ Similarly, Mistral's Magistral has posted impressive scores on advanced math benchmarks like AIME2024.¹⁶

This trend signals a significant shift in how AI applications will be built. The future is not one monolithic AI but rather a system of interconnected, specialized models. We are already seeing this with the proliferation of model tiers: OpenAI offers GPT-4o for speed, GPT-4o Mini for cost, and the 'o' series for deep thought.⁷ A sophisticated application of the near future will likely use a fast, cheap model like GPT-4o Mini for initial user interaction. When a user poses a complex query, the application will act as an intelligent dispatcher, routing the task to a powerful reasoning engine like o3 or Magistral for deep analysis. The answer is then passed back to the conversational model for delivery to the user. This moves the developer's role from simply prompting an AI to orchestrating a team of specialized AIs, each chosen for its unique strengths.

Part 2: Hands-On Review of Proprietary Generative AI Models

We now turn to the closed-source giants that continue to push the boundaries of AI. For each major player, we will review their key releases from 2024-2025, share insights from our hands-on testing, highlight unique features, and provide a clear verdict on who should use their models and for what purpose.

OpenAI's Expanding Universe (GPT-4o, o-Series, and the Road to GPT-5)

OpenAI has maintained a blistering pace of innovation, releasing a tiered family of models designed for different use cases, from real-time conversation to deep scientific reasoning.⁷ The company's roadmap points toward the highly anticipated GPT-5, expected in the summer of 2025.²¹

GPT-4o ("Omni"): The Multimodal Speedster

Released in May 2024, GPT-4o ("Omni") was a landmark achievement in multimodal AI.⁷

• Unique Features: Its defining characteristic is the native, real-time processing of text, audio, and vision through a single model. This architecture enables incredibly low latency (averaging 0.32 seconds), making interactions feel truly conversational.⁵ It was also launched at half the cost and twice the speed of its predecessor, GPT-4 Turbo, democratizing access to high-end AI.⁶
• Our Experience (Pros): In our tests, the real-time voice and vision capabilities are a genuine game-changer. We held fluid, emotionally nuanced conversations and used its vision to get live help with tasks. For interactive applications like tutoring or customer support, this model represents a new standard. Furthermore, its vastly improved multilingual tokenizer makes it more efficient and cost-effective for non-English content.⁶
• Our Experience (Cons): The focus on speed comes with a trade-off. We confirmed user reports that for highly structured, step-by-step instructions, GPT-4o can sometimes be less thorough or more prone to ignoring specific constraints than the older, slower GPT-4.¹⁸ It occasionally prioritizes a fast answer over a deep one, omitting the rich context that previous models provided.
• Best For:
• Job Roles: Customer Support Agents, Tutors, Live Translators, Content Creators, Product Brainstormers.
• Tasks: Real-time conversational AI, interactive learning tools, live translation, multimodal brainstorming, and dynamic content creation.

The 'o' Series (o1 & o3): The Reasoning Specialists

With the 'o' series, OpenAI introduced models built not for speed, but for depth.

• Unique Features: These models are engineered for methodical reasoning, designed to take more "thinking time" to deconstruct complex problems.⁷ The o1 model, released in September 2024, achieved PhD-level performance in physics, chemistry, and biology.⁷ Its successor, o3 (December 2024), introduced "deliberative alignment," allowing it to perform even better on general intelligence benchmarks by dynamically adjusting its compute based on task complexity.⁷
• Our Experience (Pros): We tasked these models with logic puzzles and scientific problems that consistently stumped generalist AIs. Their performance was remarkable. They don't provide quick answers; they provide detailed, step-by-step derivations that are incredibly accurate. They are not fast, but they are exceptionally thorough.⁷
• Our Experience (Cons): These are highly specialized and expensive tools. Using o3 for a simple email summary is like using a supercomputer to do basic arithmetic. They are not conversationalists and are overkill for the vast majority of common AI tasks.
• Best For:
• Job Roles: PhD Researchers, Scientists (Physics, Chemistry, Biology), Mathematicians, AI Safety Researchers, Systems Auditors.
• Tasks: Solving novel scientific problems, advanced mathematical theorem proving, auditing complex financial or logical systems, and high-stakes analysis where accuracy is paramount.

Google's Gemini Dynasty (Gemini 2.0 & 2.5 Pro/Flash)

Google DeepMind's Gemini family has emerged as a formidable competitor, focusing on massive context windows, deep reasoning, and tight integration with its vast ecosystem of products.¹¹ The latest models, including Gemini 2.0 Pro (February 2025) and 2.5 Pro (March 2025), have set new industry standards.⁸

Gemini 2.5 Pro: The Context King

• Unique Features: Gemini 2.5 Pro's standout feature is its colossal 1 million token context window (with a planned upgrade to 2 million), which allows it to process and reason over entire books, sprawling codebases, or years of financial reports in a single prompt.¹ It also demonstrates exceptional performance in coding and complex reasoning tasks and is deeply integrated into Google Workspace and Vertex AI.¹¹
• Our Experience (Pros): We put the context window to the test, feeding it entire software development kits and lengthy legal contracts. Its ability to recall minute details from page 5 while analyzing a concept on page 500 was unparalleled. In our coding tests, it consistently provided more structured, in-depth, and technically rich responses compared to its rivals, making it a powerful tool for developers.¹¹
• Our Experience (Cons): The power of a million-token context window comes at a computational cost. For tasks that don't require such a vast memory, it can be less efficient than more streamlined models. In some of our creative writing tests, we found its output to be highly competent but occasionally lacking the wit or distinct personality of other models.²⁶
• Best For:
• Job Roles: Software Architects, Legal Analysts, Financial Auditors, Enterprise Developers, Corporate Strategists.
• Tasks: Large-scale codebase analysis and refactoring, comprehensive legal document review, analysis of extensive financial reports, and building custom enterprise AI solutions that leverage large internal knowledge bases.

Gemini 2.0/2.5 Flash & Flash-Lite: The Efficiency Champions

These models are Google's answer to the need for speed and cost-efficiency. They are optimized for low latency and are positioned as the default workhorse models for high-volume, real-time applications where a balance of performance and cost is critical.⁸ They are ideal for powering chatbots, content summarization tools, and automated data processing workflows.¹¹

Anthropic's Constitutional Approach (Claude 3.5/3.7 Sonnet & Claude 4)

Anthropic has carved out a distinct identity by prioritizing AI safety, reliability, and enterprise-readiness. Its Claude family of models, including the highly capable Claude 3.5 Sonnet (released June 2024 and updated in October 2024) and Claude 3.7 Sonnet (February 2025), are designed to be powerful yet steerable.¹

Claude 3.5/3.7 Sonnet: The Safe and Capable Coder

• Unique Features: Anthropic's commitment to "Constitutional AI" results in models that are highly reliable and less prone to generating harmful or biased content.¹³ A standout innovation is the "Artifacts" feature, which creates a dedicated workspace where users can edit and build upon Claude's generated code or documents in real-time.²⁹ A groundbreaking update in October 2024 introduced a "computer use" capability, allowing the model to interact with graphical user interfaces—looking at a screen, moving a cursor, and typing—to perform tasks autonomously.²⁹
• Our Experience (Pros): Our hands-on tests confirm Claude's reputation as a coding powerhouse. It consistently scores at the top of agentic coding benchmarks like SWE-Bench, making it incredibly effective for tasks like fixing bugs or adding features to an existing codebase.¹³ Its vision capabilities are also top-tier, especially for interpreting charts and graphs.³⁴ The Artifacts feature is a genuinely useful productivity booster for developers.
• Our Experience (Cons): While it operates at twice the speed of its predecessor, Claude 3 Opus, our tests showed it can still have slightly higher latency than GPT-4o.³⁴ Its stringent safety guardrails, a major pro for enterprise use, can occasionally feel restrictive in more open-ended creative or exploratory tasks.
• Best For:
• Job Roles: Enterprise Software Developers, DevOps Engineers, Financial Services Professionals, Healthcare Analysts, Compliance Officers.
• Tasks: Agentic coding and software testing, updating legacy applications, automating workflows in high-stakes enterprise environments, visual data analysis from charts and graphs, and content generation where safety and factual grounding are paramount.

Part 3: The Best AI Models for Customization and Control

While proprietary models push the performance frontier, a parallel revolution is happening in the open-source community. Open-weight models are democratizing access to powerful AI, empowering developers and organizations that require transparency, customization, and full control over their data and infrastructure.

Meta's Llama 4 Herd (Scout & Maverick): The Power of Open Scale

With the release of the Llama 4 family in April 2025, Meta solidified its position as a champion of open-source AI, delivering models with massive scale and impressive capabilities.⁹

• Unique Features: The Llama 4 models are Meta's first to be natively multimodal and are built on an efficient Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture.⁹ The family includes Llama 4 Scout, which boasts an industry-leading 10 million token context window, and the more powerful Llama 4 Maverick.¹⁴ The models also benefit from extensive multilingual pre-training, making them highly capable across many languages.⁹
• Our Experience (Pros): The cost-to-performance ratio of the Llama 4 models is exceptional. For a wide range of business use cases—such as powering internal chatbots or summarizing knowledge bases—Llama 4 is more than "good enough" and is significantly cheaper to run at scale than proprietary alternatives.¹⁴ The ability to self-host and fine-tune the model on private data is a critical advantage for enterprises with strict data privacy requirements or those looking to build highly specialized vertical solutions. We also noted its reduced refusal rate on sensitive topics makes it more flexible for certain dialogue and research applications.¹⁴
• Our Experience (Cons): Our tests, along with widespread community feedback, revealed a noticeable gap between the models' stellar benchmark scores and their practical, real-world usability. The headline-grabbing 10 million token context window of Llama 4 Scout reportedly begins to struggle with recall and coherence well before its theoretical limit.³⁸ While competent, its image comprehension and coding abilities still trail the top-tier proprietary models like GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet.³⁸ The initial release was also met with some controversy regarding the transparency of its benchmarking practices.³⁶
• Best For:
• Job Roles: AI Researchers, Startups, Developers building specialized vertical AI applications, and companies in regulated industries with strict data privacy mandates.
• Tasks: Building custom chatbots and copilots, summarizing internal corporate knowledge bases, multilingual content generation, and academic research requiring model transparency.

Mistral AI's European Offensive (Magistral & Medium 3): The Specialist's Choice

Paris-based Mistral AI has rapidly emerged as a major force, challenging Silicon Valley's dominance with a portfolio of high-performance open and proprietary models. Their 2025 releases, including Mistral Medium 3 and the Magistral family, are aimed squarely at the enterprise and specialist markets.⁴⁰

Magistral: The Reasoning Virtuoso

Released in June 2025, Magistral is not a general-purpose model; it is a specialist built for one thing: reasoning.¹⁶

• Unique Features: Magistral is purpose-built for transparent, multi-step logical deduction. Its key innovation is the ability to provide a traceable "chain-of-thought," allowing users to see exactly how it arrived at a conclusion.¹⁶ It demonstrates strong reasoning capabilities across multiple languages and is available in both an open-weight (Magistral Small) and a more powerful enterprise (Magistral Medium) version.²⁰
• Our Experience (Pros): Magistral's ability to "show its work" is a game-changer for regulated industries like finance, law, and healthcare, where auditability and explainability are not just desirable but often legally required.¹⁶ In our tests, it excelled at structured, logical tasks like financial modeling, legal analysis, and complex project planning, where precision is far more important than creative flair.¹⁶
• Our Experience (Cons): As a specialist tool, it has a smaller context window (around 40k tokens) than many of its generalist peers.²⁰ Some users have noted that for general tasks, the performance gain in pure reasoning may not justify the usability trade-offs or cost compared to more versatile models.²⁰
• Best For:
• Job Roles: Legal Analysts, Financial Planners, Compliance Officers, Data Engineers, System Architects, Healthcare Administrators.
• Tasks: Legal research and contract analysis, financial forecasting and risk assessment, compliance auditing, complex system design, and logistical optimization.

Mistral Medium 3: The Enterprise Challenger

Released in May 2025, Mistral Medium 3 is designed to compete directly with the top proprietary models from OpenAI and Anthropic.⁴¹ It balances frontier-level performance with a significantly lower cost structure and is built for flexible enterprise deployment and customization, making it a powerful choice for organizations seeking a high-performance, cost-effective, and adaptable alternative for a wide range of professional use cases.⁴¹

Part 4: Strategic Selection of the Top LLMs

Synthesizing our hands-on testing and analysis, this section provides actionable, comparative frameworks to help you select from the best AI models for your specific needs. The choice depends less on finding a single "best" model and more on matching a model's unique strengths to your context.

Head-to-Head Performance Matrix

Benchmarks provide a vital, if imperfect, snapshot of a model's raw capabilities. They are the industry's primary tool for objective comparison, cutting through marketing claims to show which LLM AI models lead in critical areas like reasoning and coding.¹³ The following table consolidates key benchmark scores for the leading models of 2024-2025.

Table 1: The 2025 LLM AI Benchmark Leaderboard

Note: Benchmarks are from multiple sources 7 and represent a snapshot in time. Direct comparisons can be complex due to different evaluation methodologies. denotes a reasoning-focused variant.

The Right Tool for the Job: Use-Case Suitability Matrix

While benchmarks measure raw intelligence, this table translates those capabilities into real-world business applications. It is designed to help project managers and business leaders identify the best model for their specific workflow, based on our hands-on testing and the models' stated strengths.¹¹

Table 2: Mapping Generative AI Models to Your Workflow

A detailed comparison of the leading large language models reveals distinct strengths and weaknesses across a variety of applications. The following table provides a use-case-based analysis of GPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Llama 4 Maverick, and Magistral Medium.

Recommendations by Professional Role

• For the Software Developer & Architect: Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the top choice for agentic coding tasks, debugging, and ensuring safe, reliable code within an enterprise setting.¹³ For architects needing to analyze or refactor massive, legacy codebases,
  Gemini 2.5 Pro's enormous context window is indispensable.¹¹ For developers at startups or those needing full control and customization over their environment,
  Llama 4 offers an excellent open-weight platform for fine-tuning on a specific tech stack.¹⁴
• For the Marketer & Content Creator: GPT-4o is the ideal creative partner. Its unmatched speed, conversational fluency, and native multimodal capabilities make it perfect for brainstorming campaigns, generating ad copy, and creating content from text, image, and voice prompts.⁵ For those focused on long-form creative writing,
  Magistral is a surprisingly powerful tool, leveraging its reasoning engine to produce highly coherent and logical plots.¹⁶
• For the Financial & Legal Analyst: Magistral stands out for its auditable, traceable reasoning, a critical feature for maintaining compliance and explainability in regulated fields.¹⁶
  Claude 3.5 Sonnet is another top-tier choice due to its high reliability and exceptional ability to interpret data from charts and graphs.³⁴ For reviewing vast archives of financial filings or legal precedents,
  Gemini 2.5 Pro is the clear winner due to its context capacity.¹¹
• For the Scientist & Researcher: For tackling novel, PhD-level scientific and mathematical problems, OpenAI's o-series models are in a class of their own.⁷ For academic researchers who require model transparency, reproducibility, and the ability to inspect model weights, the open nature of
  Llama 4 makes it an invaluable tool.¹³

Conclusion: Charting the Course for the Future of AI

The developments of 2024 and 2025 have fundamentally reshaped the AI landscape. We have moved from an era of general-purpose chatbots to a diverse ecosystem of specialized tools. The key trends are clear: a divergence between fast generalists and deep-thinking specialists; the maturation of open-source models into true competitors; a massive expansion in context windows, enabling new forms of analysis; and the dawn of truly agentic AI.

The road ahead points toward even greater specialization and autonomy. The "computer use" feature in Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a nascent step toward AI agents that can not only reason but act, navigating applications and performing complex tasks across digital environments.²⁹ The future of complex AI applications lies not with a single, all-powerful model, but with "AI model ensembles"—systems that intelligently orchestrate a variety of specialized AIs, each contributing its unique strength. For professionals and organizations, the challenge and opportunity are no longer just about adopting AI, but about learning to choose the right tool—or team of tools—for the job. By experimenting with these new

AI LLMs and understanding their distinct capabilities, you can chart a course to effectively harness their transformative potential.

Works cited

1. Best 44 Large Language Models (LLMs) in 2025 - Exploding Topics, accessed June 27, 2025, https://explodingtopics.com/blog/list-of-llms
2. Generative artificial intelligence - Wikipedia, accessed June 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generative_artificial_intelligence
3. Types of Generative Models | Coursera, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.coursera.org/articles/types-of-generative-models
4. 9 Top Open-Source LLMs for 2024 and Their Uses - DataCamp, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.datacamp.com/blog/top-open-source-llms
5. GPT-4o Guide: How it Works, Use Cases, Pricing, Benchmarks | DataCamp, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.datacamp.com/blog/what-is-gpt-4o
6. Hello GPT-4o | OpenAI, accessed June 27, 2025, https://openai.com/index/hello-gpt-4o/
7. The Defining Moments in Generative AI From 2024 - Dataiku blog, accessed June 27, 2025, https://blog.dataiku.com/the-defining-moments-in-generative-ai-from-2024
8. Gemini (language model) - Wikipedia, accessed June 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_(language_model)
9. The Llama 4 herd: The beginning of a new era of natively ..., accessed June 27, 2025, https://ai.meta.com/blog/llama-4-multimodal-intelligence/
10. We Tried 11 of the Best AI Headshot Generators - Headshot Pro, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.headshotpro.com/best-ai-headshot-generators
11. Google Gemini 2.0 Pro Brings Advanced Reasoning, Coding and ..., accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.reworked.co/digital-workplace/googles-gemini-20-pro-can-shake-up-the-workplace-heres-how/
12. Top 9 Large Language Models as of June 2025 | Shakudo, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.shakudo.io/blog/top-9-large-language-models
13. The Ultimate Guide to the Latest LLMs: A Detailed Comparison for 2025 - Empler AI, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.empler.ai/blog/the-ultimate-guide-to-the-latest-llms-a-detailed-comparison-for-2025
14. Meta's Llama 4 Models Are Bad for Rivals but Good for Enterprises, Experts Say, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.pymnts.com/artificial-intelligence-2/2025/metas-llama-4-models-are-bad-for-rivals-but-good-for-enterprises-experts-say/
15. meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct - Hugging Face, accessed June 27, 2025, https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct
16. Magistral | Mistral AI, accessed June 27, 2025, https://mistral.ai/news/magistral
17. LLM Trends 2025: A Deep Dive into the Future of Large Language Models | by PrajnaAI, accessed June 27, 2025, https://prajnaaiwisdom.medium.com/llm-trends-2025-a-deep-dive-into-the-future-of-large-language-models-bff23aa7cdbc
18. GPT-4.5 is Here, But is it Really an Upgrade? My Extensive Testing Suggests Otherwise, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTPro/comments/1j55h6m/gpt45_is_here_but_is_it_really_an_upgrade_my/
19. 7 Best Large Language Models to Check in 2025 - HeLa Labs, accessed June 27, 2025, https://helalabs.com/blog/7-best-large-language-models-to-check-in-2025/
20. Mistral AI Releases Magistral, Its First Reasoning-Focused Language Model - InfoQ, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.infoq.com/news/2025/06/mistral-ai-magistral/
21. ChatGPT 5 release date: what we know about OpenAI's next chatbot as rumours suggest summer release - Evening Standard, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.standard.co.uk/news/tech/chatgpt-5-release-date-details-openai-chatbot-sam-altman-b1130369.html
22. When Will ChatGPT-5 Be Released (June 2025 Info) - Exploding Topics, accessed June 27, 2025, https://explodingtopics.com/blog/new-chatgpt-release-date
23. GPT-4 vs GPT-4o? Which is the better? - OpenAI Developer Community, accessed June 27, 2025, https://community.openai.com/t/gpt-4-vs-gpt-4o-which-is-the-better/746991
24. What You Need to Know About Gemini 2.0 - Promevo, accessed June 27, 2025, https://promevo.com/blog/what-is-gemini-2.0
25. The Ultimate Guide to the Top Large Language Models in 2025 - CodeDesign.ai, accessed June 27, 2025, https://codedesign.ai/blog/the-ultimate-guide-to-the-top-large-language-models-in-2025/
26. I tested Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemini 2.0 Pro — here's the winner | Tom's Guide, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.tomsguide.com/ai/i-tested-gemini-2-0-flash-vs-gemini-2-0-pro-heres-the-winner
27. Everything About Gemini 2.0 Pro - what do you guys think? ( DUMP EVERYTHING ) : r/Bard, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Bard/comments/1ia70wk/everything_about_gemini_20_pro_what_do_you_guys/
28. Gemini 2.0: Flash, Flash-Lite and Pro - Google Developers Blog, accessed June 27, 2025, https://developers.googleblog.com/en/gemini-2-family-expands/
29. en.wikipedia.org, accessed June 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_(language_model)
30. 10 Things to Know About Claude 3.5 Sonnet - Unite.AI, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.unite.ai/10-things-to-know-about-claude-3-5-sonnet/
31. What Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet? How It Works, Use Cases, and Artifacts | DataCamp, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.datacamp.com/blog/claude-sonnet-anthropic
32. Claude 3.5 Sonnet: New Features, Pricing, Advantages & Comparisons - Apidog, accessed June 27, 2025, https://apidog.com/blog/claude-3-5-sonnet/
33. Introducing computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku - Anthropic, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.anthropic.com/news/3-5-models-and-computer-use
34. Introducing Claude 3.5 Sonnet \ Anthropic, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-3-5-sonnet
35. Comparing the Effectiveness of Claude Sonnet 3.5 to Competitors | by Curiosity - Medium, accessed June 27, 2025, https://medium.com/@viridi99/comparing-the-effectiveness-of-claude-sonnet-3-5-to-competitors-f9e539718f40
36. Llama 4 Just Dropped: Meta and THE USA are in Deep Shit! | by reviewraccoon - Medium, accessed June 27, 2025, https://medium.com/@reviewraccoon/llama-4-just-dropped-meta-and-the-usa-are-in-deep-shit-c4f6c5b33566
37. The Complete Guide to Meta's Llama 4: Features, Performance, and Applications - Medium, accessed June 27, 2025, https://medium.com/@tejassinroja/the-complete-guide-to-metas-llama-4-features-performance-and-applications-75f9827abb5c
38. Llama 4 Review: Real-World Use vs. Meta's Hype - Monica, accessed June 27, 2025, https://monica.im/blog/llama-4/
39. I'm incredibly disappointed with Llama-4 : r/LocalLLaMA - Reddit, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1jsl37d/im_incredibly_disappointed_with_llama4/
40. Models Overview - Mistral AI Documentation, accessed June 27, 2025, https://docs.mistral.ai/getting-started/models/models_overview/
41. Medium is the new large. - Mistral AI, accessed June 27, 2025, https://mistral.ai/news/mistral-medium-3
42. Magistral: Mistral AI challenges big tech with reasoning model, accessed June 27, 2025, https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/news/magistral-mistral-ai-challenges-big-tech-reasoning-model/
43. Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI - Simon Willison's Weblog, accessed June 27, 2025, https://simonwillison.net/2025/Jun/10/magistral/
44. Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct '24): Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis, accessed June 27, 2025, https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/claude-35-sonnet